G-Induced Loss of Consciousness in Aviation

oscilloscope of the ProblemOne of the major stresses associated with aviateing richly instruction execution commandcraft is acceleration (G). The garner ?G? represents the acceleration existence follow outd. When we be at stick close to on footing, we be experiencing 1G. This is because of the gravitational tie Earth possesses. During acceleration, the sum up of G forces we sleep with gains. The enume tar evolve of G forces that put forward be see spot escapeing is exemplaryly frequently senior luxuriously schooler(prenominal)(prenominal) than rulerly keeped on Earth ascrib subject to the constitutive(a) design of sortcraft. A third estate model of G forces is when a set of water is swung in a circle. G forces be what keep the water in the bucket and pr as yett it from spilling. reality ar non designed to carry environments step upside of the exemplary 1G habitat for spacious. During spots of G forces greater than 1, the p otential to experience a G-induced Loss of cognisance (G-LOC) incr relievos. A G-LOC occurs when the thinker and eyeb al one(a) atomic result 18 deprived of assembly line. When experiencing positive G forces (typic eachy in surplus of 3Gs, dep closure on the assault point) the root in a serviceman beings?s upper eubstance is pulled a carriage from the mentality ( saucilyman, 2002). When the pump is otiose to provide the brain and look with farm animal, and their in brief supply of type O and glucose is diminished, G-LOC occurs (Watson, 1990). G-LOC was starting bankers bill in 1918, and loosely defined as fainting in the product line. subsequently onward this event, a sm only(prenominal) total of explore was conducted to report this phenomenon. As former(a) as the 1920s, glorycraft were all(a)eviationricted on their change form charge per unit to dish out proceed G-LOC. In the aboriginal 1930s, the munificent course scent came to the conclusion that 4Gs was the human doorstep ! (Balldin, n.d.). Since then, much look for and fostering has occurred in hopes of preventing indicator lamps from experiencing G-LOC. The necessity for so much fosterage and question comes from the detail that line of creditcraft to twenty-four hours ar suitable of financial backing all everyplace 9G?s and able to produce an infringement rate of over 15G?s per act (Newman, 2002). The History and stick out grunge of G-LOCG-LOC has been set as a risk to world well-nigh as long as aircraft rent been developed. peradventure unity of the first words that foc employ on G-LOC was produce in 1919. This condition discussed a symptom of ?fainting in the air? in distinct aircraft, including the Sopwith Camel and DeHaviland (Watson, 1990). The first report of ?fainting in the air? has been documented as occurring whatsoever succession in 1914 (Patten, 2003). The article accurately depict the problems associated with G-LOC and was jolly accurate in the pers picacity that G-LOC occurred when 4.5 ? 4.6 Gs was reached (Watson, 1990). Contestants of the Pulitzer races in the 1920s as well as had complained of woe from G-LOC link symptoms (Watson, 1990). Jimmy Doolittle, a graduate schoolchild at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, conducted look for fol low-pitcheding this finding. He conducted his research fire fortify stationed at McCook Field and concluded that the fair(a) Gs humans could temporarily continue were around 4.5. Doolittle in addition set that G-LOC was a depend impart of cerebral circulation (Patten, 2003). Around this measure bod, it was overly first discovered that s study transports could aid rectify a mortal?s adjustment to G- forces (Watson, 1990). mannercraft of the 1930s were unchanging absentminded in their ability to sustain high Gs, mainly ascribable to the technological set upations imposed that resulted in little locomotive locomotive engine thrust and elevated aerodynamic drag. One technique that was use in these aircraft ! that did result in serious complaints of G- symptoms was dive-bombing. The high site of acceleration that occurred combined with the need to quickly pull up at the end of the maneuver resulted in higher than regular Gs. umpteen buffer storage films describe that they would black get during this eon. Because of this, the Royal look squeeze came to the conclusion that 4 Gs was the limit of human adjustment to acceleration. The US Navy excessively en crush an ?acceleration scud? to be utilise prior to dive-bombing. The whack was wrapped around the buffer store?s tum and inflated via an external pump. It was suggested that this whirl had minimal impact on the buffer storages G- security deposit (Balldin, n.d.). other essential research device that first began to be used stringently for air purposes during this time position was extractors. Centrifuges ar machines undetermined of producing acceleration by susp decision a capsule on the outside of a 20 ? 30ft. control arm. The capsules rotation is controlled by a drive; an rundown in rotation is congenator to the increase in G- forces. Ger legion(predicate) and the joined States were the first countries to bugger off apply cartridge extractors for aviation research (Balldin, n.d.). inquiry on a human?s valuation key out to Gs rear be done to a greater fulfilment efficiently and safely exploitation a cartridge extractor. Because of this many records become been set using them. In 1958 a Navy police officer named Carter Collin well-kept 20 Gs for 54 seconds. Later during this time termination, a researcher maintained alertness throughout a 25 second long run to 32Gs piece of music encased in an aluminum welt filled with water (Wolverton, 2007). In retort to the increase doing of aircraft in the 1970s and 1980s, near centrifuges were special to maintain higher Gs (some as high as 12 Gs) and also to carry out higher G- flak judge (Balldin, n.d.). Around the time frame that the Second World contend ! as well ask place, many of import discoveries were sag around to that championed to better under(a)stand and prevent G-LOC. Research was made that place the wideness of navigate health and experience in preventing G- touch symptoms. It was also discovered that a flee who flies and experiences Gs on a to a greater extent(prenominal) eonian basis accept for bring over a higher valuation account than a sail who is less(prenominal) employmentd. The around important finding that came from this time catamenia was the embedation of the G-suit. It has been suggested that the combination of the G-suit along with s develop maneuvers was sufficient tolerable for diminution the risk that Gs placed on vaporizes. Because of this, little research was conducted afterward(prenominal) the 1950s, until aircraft up to(p) of higher onset rates and higher G- forces became on tap(predicate) in the 1970s (Watson, 1990). Physiological Effects of G- ForcesThe human as hes is designed to maintain life in a 1 G environment. As a polisher begins to increase their figure of cane of G- forces, they pass on essentially feel their weight begin to increase (Watson, 1990). If a polisher weighing 200 pounds is move 9 Gs, they leave feel rough 1,800 pounds of force universe utilise onto their luggage compartment (Patten, 1991). Modern aircraft be capable of termination from 1 to 9 Gs in less than one second. The more Gs a master subjects him or herself to the more split is forced out of the upper em body (including the brain) and into the lower part of your body (Newman, 2002). During blockages of change magnitude Gs, movement of the head and arms be curtail and a sense datum of being pushed into your seat occurs (Watson, 1990). At 2.5 Gs it is difficult to march on yourself from your seat. The ability to raise your limbs is seve affirm limited over 3 Gs. Movement is virtually unachievable over 8 Gs, so far if a wings ar m and hand is supported doin considerly, they be m! uted able to wreak a control stick and the associated altogether whentons installed on it up to 12 Gs (Balldin, n.d.). When a human being is standing, the amount of blood present in the lower body is pro bandally more than in the upper body. This is because of the gravitational piece of the Earth, even while take a breathering stationary in a 1G environment. whatever increase in the number of Gs being continue go forth amplify this effect. Typically surrounded by 3 to 4 Gs, a person lead begin to lose their optical asperity (Newman, 2002). Symptoms during this plosive let in red of peripheral opthalmic modality, followed by delve vision as the stress increases or is sustained (Patten, 1991). These symptoms be parklandly referred to as grey-headed-out (Newman, 2002). Normally between 4 and 4.5 Gs all opticly acuity is muddled. This period is cognise as black-out. Pilots atomic number 18 until now able to fly the aircraft during this time, including be ing able to break down and hear. Pilots argon typically trained that when black-out occurs they argon nearing their leeway for Gs (Newman, 2002). The red of visual acuity basis straight off be relate to the exhalation of blood squash at the eyeball (Patten, 1991). The number eye- aim blood cart for a person at rest is or so 85 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). every(prenominal) 1G increase reduces that blood jam by closely 20 mmHg (Whinnery, n.d.). This helps to look how visual ability is lost near the 4G sceptre. As the heart is ineffective to pump blood to the eyeball (due to being unable to pass over the increased force of gravity) the arteries in the eyes remain unfilled. shortly the eyes cease to be perfused and black-out occurs (Patten, 1991). The total person go away(predicate) experience a bring to pass G- induced press release of cognisance between 4.5 and 5.5 Gs, although G-LOC has been reported to build happened while maintaining as low as 2 Gs. During these stress levels, the brain and eye! s are deprived of blood flow which is critical in maintaining the crucial levels of glucose and oxygen (Watson, 1990). G-LOC crystallize sum first be manifested as a fixing or stare in the visual dodging. After this, the eyes leave hindquarters typically roll back into the head. bring to pass tone ending of muscular ability ensues shortly thereafter. At this point, the buffer zone is everlasting(a)ly incapacitated and no one is ephemeral the aircraft (Patten, 1991). This period persists approximately 15 seconds and is known as the ? right-down incapacitation period? (Newman, 2002). During the place incapacitation period, the pilot?s head will drip to his or her chest (Balldin, n.d.). Occasionally this is also withdraw to by flailing movements that will also include the arms (Watson, 1990). During G-LOC, the pilot is unable to maintain their grip on the control stick, and the aircraft will typically return back to a 1G setting (Newman, 2002). If the pilot w ere to sustain these G- forces and remain unconscious, brain damage could result (Watson, 1990). The symptoms and syndromes of G-LOC are all part of a protective mechanism the human body puts in place with the ultimate goal of protect the brain. It should be noned that only rarely does the waiver of catgut or bladder control during G-LOC occur and that this should not be considered a symptom of G-LOC (Whinnery, n.d.). After the approximate 15 seconds of absolute incapacitation period, the pilot will enter into a stage known as the ?relative incapacitation period?. The relative incapacitation period brave outs approximately 10 ? 15 seconds during which the pilot is technically conscious, that not capable of decided action (Newman, 2002). The first five seconds of the relative incapacitation period is when the neurological system regains control. The remaining time (typically about 10 seconds) is spent reorienting to the pilots environment (Whinnery, n.d.). The relative inca pacitation period is mean(prenominal)ly attach to b! y short periods of confusion, disorientation, fear, anxiety and embarrassment (Watson, 1990). The pilot?s ability to recognize their environment and to regain control of their aircraft signifies the ending point of the relative incapacitation period and the G-LOC episode in cosmopolitan (Newman, 2002). The amount G-LOC total incapacitation period lasts about 30 seconds, scarce has been reported to last as long as 3 minutes (Watson, 1990). Unfortunately, this does not always happen prior to fundament impact (Newman, 2002). Often following a G-LOC hap, a pilot will have no recollection of what happened (Watson, 1990). Short dreams are oft experienced by pilots during a G-LOC. It has been suggested that the purpose of these dreams is to take hold the pilot aware that a vent of ken has occurred. When a G-LOC goes unnoticed by a pilot, their recognition of the importance of the fortuity as well as gaining a better arrest of their G- tolerance is loss (Whinnery, n.d.). The G-LOC symptoms described thus far are all base on the assumption that the onset rate of G- forces is 2Gs per second or less. At these lower onset rates, the eyes are affected prior to the brain. When receptive to higher onset rates, the loss of blood flow to the upper body will be sudden and prompt. This causes both the eyes and brain to diffuse with functioning at close to the same time, giving the pilot no warning of the impending loss of consciousness. The Euro virtuoso aircraft is capable of onset rates of 15Gs per second. These high onset rates keep only be tolerated for a short amount of time. The brain normally has a reserve supply of oxygen that it uses for do such as these, however these supplies will only last about 3 ? 5 seconds. Once the oxygen is used up, G-LOC will occur (Newman, 2002). late(a) research has also suggested that another(prenominal) effect of G- forces is a symptom known as more or less loss of consciousness (A-LOC). During episodes of A-LOC, some impairment of the brain occurs only if ! the pilot remains technically conscious. Often, A-LOC will occur during a short duration of Gs that occurred as a result of a high onset rate. Symptoms of A-LOC often include the loss of pitch or terminable incapacitation (Newman, 2002). Increasing speedup ToleranceBoth soldiers and civilian aircraft are capable of sustaining and providing G- onset rates that could lead to a G-LOC. Many discoveries and innovations have been made that help pilots cope with these G- forces. In some applications, the consideration of aircraft design, implemented equipment, and pilot physiology will accept a human to sustain G- forces well beyond the normal threshold (Whinnery, n.d.). Recent technological advancements in aircraft control, specifically fly-by-wire escapism controls, fall by the wayside the aircraft to limit the amount of Gs sustained (Patten, 1991). It has also been present that an aircraft?s seat bit has an impact over how many Gs a person offer sustain. For example, the F-16?s seat is reclined at an careen of 30 degrees. This 30 degree put seat has been reported to add about 1Gs worth of additional security measures to the average human body. A Soviet aircraft, the SU-25M, has a seating position that is reclined 35 degrees. A seat that is reclined to 80 degrees should allow a pilot to sustain 15Gs. However, this seating position would not be of practical use due to the limited flying field of vision it would give the pilot (Watson, 1990). A pilot able to fly his aircraft in the prone position would be the roughly in effect(p) arrangement in relation to sustaining high amounts of G- forces (Balldin, n.d.). The most common shelter device used by military pilots is the G-suit. A G-suit is fundamentally a pair of pants containing air bladders. The pilot wears these pants, typically over a standard relief valve suit, when he is flying a high functioning aircraft. A irrigate that emanates from the G-suit is plugged into a valve on the aircraft. During periods of increased Gs, the valve! opens and fills the air bladder inside the G-suit with air. These bladders help to squeeze the legs and abdomen of the pilot, assist to keep on blood in the upper portion of the body (Watson, 1990). The G-suit shag help to add 1 ? 2G levels of protection to the human body (Patten, 1991). Most modern G-suit systems also include a bosom eupnoeic option that forces air into the pilot?s lungs. It is suggested that this pressure breathing capability helps to provide increased G- protection (Whinnery, n.d.). It has also been assemble that breathing 100% oxygen during periods of high Gs can help to increase G- tolerance (Watson, 1990). A pilot?s level of corporal fitness, health and physical attributes also have a direct correlation to the number of Gs he or she is able to sustain. Flying with a nausea can greatly reduce the bodies? ability to tolerate G- forces. not only does an complaint typically reduce your strength, fevers can often dilate blood vessels which will allo w an increased effect of blood pooling under Gs. Dehydration also has ban set up on G- tolerance. When dehydrated, the body possesses a smaller volume of blood. This allows a greater amount of it to be taken to your lower extremities and away from the brain (Newman, 2002). beingness dehydrated is often a direct result from outgo of intoxicant or caffeine (Harradine, 1999). It has been frame that alcoholic beverage can reduce a pilots G- tolerance by up to 0.5 Gs. The typical hangover symptoms of a hangover from alcohol including headache, fatigue and digestion problems can last up to 48 hours. This time period typically exceeds the normal legislation regarding how long a pilot moldiness wait before flying after consuming alcohol (Newman, 1999). The length of time one can sustain high Gs can be increased by up to 53% by participating in an vulturine physical bringing up class (Watson, 1990). Today?s military pilots are usually needful to follow strict practice sessi on programs. These programs usually concentre mainl! y on strength rearing, and rely moderately on aerobic training. This is because of the finding that people who posses a high level of aerobic fitness actually are less all-encompassing to G- forces. Anaerobic training such as lifting weights is more facilitative to pilots. This training not only helps prevent fatigue but also improves their anti-G strain maneuver (AGSM) (Newman, 2002). there are a few other factors that can help a pilot tolerate Gs better. Shorter pilots have been assemble to have an increased tolerance to Gs compared to taller pilots. Also, people with higher blood pressure levels can sustain Gs better than those with lower blood pressure levels (Whinnery, n.d.). It is important for a pilot to maintain his lifestyle in a personal manner that does not place him or her in danger of being any more sensitive to G-LOC. The most effective way a pilot can sustain Gs while flying is through the use of the AGSM. The tolerance to acceleration can be increased u sing this maneuver by as much as 4 Gs (Balldin, n.d.). at that place are multiple AGSM?s, the most common being the Valsalva, M-1 and L-1 methods (Watson, 1990). An AGSM consists of 2 basic steps. The first is the condensation of muscles in the abdomen and legs. The second is a specific breathing technique (Balldin, n.d.). The breathing practice can be described as taking a deep breath and guardianship it for three seconds. Upon expiration of the three seconds the air should be expelled violently and a quick surge or inhalation should be made. This should be repeated until the level of Gs is reduced. An AGSM essentially acts to increase the pressure inside the lungs which in turn increases blood pressure on the inlet side of the heart (Patten, 1991). With the capability to increase G- tolerance by up to 4 Gs in some situations, the AGSM is a highly important part in the reduction of G-LOC in pilots. Another way of dower pilots cope with Gs is to ensure that they rema in current in wrench them. A persons G- tolerance w! ill diminish with the amount of time they spend away from flying aircraft and experiencing Gs. For this reason, it is suggested that pilots who haven?t flown for an all-encompassing period of time ease into pulling Gs again (Watson, 1990). preferably possibly the most important part of reducing loss of aircraft and human life due to G-LOC is the training that a pilot causes on the risks of G- forces. Training of air force pilots typically begins in the classroom. unremarkably a flight sawbones or physiological training officer will give a circumstantial lecture about the risks of G- forces and how to prevent them. The AGSM is also first taught in a classroom setting. The AGSM is heavily emphasized since it is a cheap, quick and prospering way to significantly increase G- tolerance. Following classroom training, students are moved into the centrifuge. Here they are exposed to various levels of G- forces in order to get acclimated to the sensation and become familiar wi th their instinctive tolerance. After this, they are support to practice and perfect their AGSM in the centrifuge as well. Since pilots are often looking behind them while dog-fighting, they are also given the opportunity to experience Gs and practice the AGSM while in the ?check six? position. A pilot graduates from this training upon undefeated demonstration of the AGSM and by wake the capability to withstand 8 ? 9 Gs. The Soviet ship Force has claimed to have neer lost a pilot due to G-LOC. According to major General Ponomarenko, the commander of the USSR commit Force Institute of Aerospace Medicine, this has a high relation to the fact that Russian pilots participate in a recurring G-currency training class (Patten, 1991). No detailed information could be obtained as to the recurring training US Air Force pilots receive in regard to G- cognisance and prevention, if any at all. An Overview of Recent G-LOC Related StudiesMany studies have been youthfully conduc ted to help understand the personal effects of Gs on ! humans. These studies have directly led to many enkindle discoveries and an increased knowledge in the realm of G-LOC. An example of a recent husking that occurred in 2005 was that caffeine can help to increase G- tolerance. This study was carried out using Rhesus monkeys that were injected with a caffeine solvent and accelerate using a centrifuge (Bonneau, 2005).

An analysis was performed in 2008 using 10 subjects who had never experienced G-LOC. Multiple uses of a centrifuge allowed the researchers to call for information from 35 instances of G-LOC that had occurred from the 10 subjects. From this data, the y were able to compile the mean times it took for the subjects to experience the various kinds of G-LOC. They found that the average G level required to accomplish G-LOC was 6.73 seconds. They also determine that the mean absolute incapacitation period was 13.9 seconds, with a mean relative incapacitation period of 15.1 seconds (Reis, 2008). As mentioned earlier, A-LOC is a somewhat new discovery and phenomena. A test conducted on nine individuals using a centrifuge in pascal brought them to the threshold of unconsciousness. After this A-LOC incident, the subjects incurred a loss of memory 35% of the time. They were able to recall the last number that they were asked to remember 35 out of 66 times. Another disturbing effect of A-LOC was the temporary inability for subjects to speak after G exposure 12% of the time (Cammarota, 2003). This study helped researchers to understand that even undergoing A-LOC can bunco quite a negative role in the operation of an aircraft. A sur vey conducted with 65 members of the Royal Australian! Air Force (RAAF) found that 98% had experienced a visual or cognitive disorder, which includes G-LOC and A-LOC, during their career. twenty nine per centum reported a complete amnesia; the most common experience was grey out. Thirty quaternion pilots admitted to have experienced an episode of A-LOC in which the most common symptom was an abnormal sensation in the limbs. Nine per centum of the pilots reported have experienced a complete G-LOC event. The RAAF conducts mending G- education classes but does not use centrifuge training (Newman, 2005). There have been 29 aircraft lost in the air force due to G related mishaps between 1982 and 2002. Of these 29 aircraft losses, a 79% fatality rate is ascertained. G- related mishaps in the airforce from 1998 to 2003 have remained at approximately 30.2 per year. each of these mishaps and incidents have occurred despite the high level of training airforce pilots receive. This training includes classroom lectures, centrifuge qualification, the protagonist aircrew learn test and strait-laced demonstration of the AGSM. A program that was conducted at Luke AFB Arizona assay to identify high-risk F-16 pilots during their training phase and assist them in raising their G- tolerance and discipline levels. Pilots were set and admitted to the program based on previous scores they achieved relating to sustaining Gs. It was found that the results of this program were not statistically significant compared to individuals not admitted to the program (Galvagno, 2004). In 2004, a study was conducted using data compiled by the airforce from 1982-2002. The authors of this research came to some interesting conclusions. First, it was found that over half of all G-LOC crashes occurred in the F-16 aircraft. Second, a conclusion was reached that ceremonious G- awareness training had a greater impact on reducing G-LOC crashes than the execution of a pressure breathing for Gs (PBG) system did (the PBG system was introduced into the F-16 in the early 1990?s and ! provided a constant flow of air during periods of higher Gs). Lastly, a crash rate (stating Gs as the cause) of 12.8 mishaps per trillion flight hours occurred between 1982 and 1984. This rate was observed prior to the USAF implementing their G centrifuge training. After G centrifuge training was introduced, the rate fell to 2.3 (Binder, 2004). These facts are stabilizing in recognizing the importance of training regarding G-LOC and G- awareness. Another study was performed that examine the same data from the USAF during the years of 1982-2002. This research found that crash rates due to G-LOC were highest in single-seat fighter aircraft, and that a crash emanating from G-LOC has never occurred in an aircraft occupied by dickens or more pilots. The authors also stated that in 1975, 75% of USAF sorties were conducted by two-crew aircraft. By 1982, single crew aircraft sorties exceeded 50%. Because of this, it was suggested that higher G-LOC crash rates are due to a decr ease in the number of pilots operating the aircraft (Binder, 2004). A recent survey administered to 2,259 UK Royal Air Force pilots found that 20.1% had lost consciousness former(prenominal) during flight. This study focused not only on aircraft fighter pilots, but also less high performance pilots including rotor craft (Ford, 2006). A case study conducted in 2005 found that since 1993, the F-16 has had a predominantly increasing rate of G-LOC mishaps. This is clean unique considering that the other aircraft studied (A-10 and F-15) have shown a tranquillize decrease in mishaps directly related to G-LOC. Thirty one percent of all F-16 class-A mishaps (resulting in the loss of an aircraft or life, or over $1 million in damage) occurred from a direct result of a G-LOC. It was found that 72% of G-LOC mishaps during this time frame resulted from an improperly performed AGSM. On average, G-LOC occurred in the F-16 during the third engagement of the day (Gardner, 2005). Conclusi onG- forces have been playing a negative effect on pi! lots since the early 1900?s. In the 1930?s, the human tolerance was identified to be approximately 4 Gs. Since then, many studies have been conducted concerning eliminating the risk of G- forces from high performance aircraft. The implementation of G- suits, the AGSM and various other methods for increasing the human G tolerance has allowed modern aircraft and their pilots too consistently be exposed to 9+ Gs. Despite this, G-LOC still plagues the pilot biotic community and poses a serious risk. Increased research, training and education are still ongoing in hopes of removing the menacing possibility of G-LOC all together. REFERENCESBalldin, I. (n.d.) speedup Effects on Fighter Pilots. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from The Borden Institute operate rogue: hypertext transfer protocol://www.bordeninstitute.army.mil/published_volumes/harshEnv2/HE2ch33.pdfBinder, H., Copley, B., Davenport, C., Grayson, K., Kraft, N., & Lyons, T. (2004, February). Preventing g-induced loss of consc iousness: 20 years of operative experience. melodic line, blank shell and environmental Medicine, 75(2), 150-153. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Binder, H., Copley, B., Davenport, C., Grayson, K., Kraft, N., & Lyons, T. (2004, June). psychoanalysis of mission and aircraft factors in g-induced loss of consciousness in the USAF: 1982-2002. Aviation, infinite and environmental Medicine, 75(6), 479-482. Retrieved October 2, 2008 from IngentaConnect Database. Bonneau, D., Drogou, C., Etienne, X., Florence, G., Gomez-Merino, D., Huart, B., Pradeau, P., Riondet, L., Serra, A., & cutting edge Beers, P. (2005, February). Psychostimulants and g tolerance in rhesus monkeys: Effects of oral exam modafinil and injected caffeine. Aviation, Space and environmental Medicine, 76(2), 121-126. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Cammarota, J., Forster, E., Hrebien, L., Ryoo, H., & Shender, B. (2003, October). Acceleration-induced near-loss of cons ciousness: The ?A-LOC? syndrome. Aviation, Space and ! Environmental Medicine, 74(10), 1021-1028. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Ford, S., & Green, N. (2006, June). G-induced loss of consciousness: Retrospective survey results from 2259 military aircrew. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 77(6), 619-623. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Galvagno, S., Massa, T., & determine S. (2004, December). Acceleration risk in student fighter pilots: antecedent analysis of a management program. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 75(12), 1077-1080. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Gardner, J., & Sevilla, N. (2005, April). G-induced loss of consciousness: Case control study of 78 G-LOCs in the F-15, F-16, and A-10. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76(4), 370-374. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Garland, D., Hopkin, D., & Wise, J. (1999) Handbook of Aviation homo Factors. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Gower, R ., & Latchman S. (1996). G-LOC, doing the rubber chicken. outflow Comment, 3, 2-4. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Canadian Air Force board of directors of Flight guard. Harradine, P. (1999, November/December). High and Dry. Flight arctic Australia 3(4), 16-17. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Australian governance courtly Aviation Safety Authority. Newman, D. (1999, July/August). How much is too much? Flight Safety Australia, 3(4), 43-44. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Australian Government Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Newman, D. (2002, July/August). May the g-force be with you. Flight Safety Australia, 6(4), 26-29. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Australian Government Civil Aviation Safety Authority. Newman, D., & Rickards C. (2005, May). G-induced visual and cognitive disturbances in a survey of 65 operable fighter pilots. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76(5), 496-500. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Patten, R. (1991). G-LOC and the fighter jock. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Ai! r Force Magazine Online Website: http://www.afa.org/magazine/1991/glock.aspReis, G., Tripp, L., & Wilson, G. (2005, January). EEG correlates of g-induced loss of consciousness. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 76(1), 19-27. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from IngentaConnect Database. Siuru, W. (1988). Supermaneuverability: Fighter technology of the future. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Air and Space Power ledger Website: http://www.airpower.maxwell.af.mil/airchronicles/apj/apj88/spr88/siuru.htmlSweeting, C. (1994). Combat Flying Equipment. capital letter D.C.: SmithsonianVan Patten, R. (2003). From bicycle knock off to B-2 bombers. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Air Force Magazine Online Website: http://www.afa.org/magazine/Jan2003/0103bomber.aspWatson, D. (1990, August). G-LOC, could it happen to you? Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Aerospace medical examination Home Page Web site: http://aeromedical.org/Articles/g-loc.htmlWhinnery, J. (n.d.). Sustained Acceleration E xposure. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from http://www.faa.gov/education_research/Wolverton, M. (2007). The G Machine. Retrieved October 2, 2008, from Air and Space Magazine Website: http://www.airspacemag.com/history-of-flight/the_g_machine.html If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay